Give me your account and I'll trade for you and make money for you.
MAM | PAMM | LAMM | POA
Forex prop firm | Asset management company | Personal large funds.
Formal starting from $500,000, test starting from $50,000.
Profits are shared by half (50%), and losses are shared by a quarter (25%).


Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management


In forex trading, investors should strive to shed the common emotions of greed and fear.
From a technical perspective, adopting a light-weight, long-term strategy is an effective approach. From a mental perspective, enjoying life can alleviate these negative emotions to a certain extent. However, the key lies in the investor's continuous cultivation and improvement.
From a technical perspective, a light-weight, long-term strategy can effectively reduce the risk exposure of a single trade, allowing investors to maintain a relatively stable mindset in the face of market fluctuations. This strategy requires investors to have a relatively accurate assessment of market trends and the ability to patiently wait for appropriate entry and exit points. By holding positions for the long term, investors can better withstand short-term market fluctuations and achieve stable returns.
From a mental perspective, enjoying life can help alleviate stress and negative emotions during trading. Investors should maintain a sense of enjoyment in life outside of trading and avoid excessive obsession with trading, which can lead to mental fatigue and emotional fluctuations. This lifestyle adjustment method can help investors alleviate greed and fear in the short term, but it's not a fundamental solution.
To fundamentally address greed and fear, investors need to continuously improve their cognitive abilities and trading skills. In the early stages of trading, investors may face numerous challenges, making it difficult to overcome these emotions all at once. Appropriate lifestyle adjustments can indeed provide some relief. However, in the long term, investors should gradually deepen their understanding of the market through continuous learning and practice, thereby fundamentally overcoming these negative emotions.
As investors gain sufficient experience in the market, they will gradually adapt to market fluctuations and become familiar with various situations. This adaptability stems from a deep understanding of market dynamics and effective emotional management. Ultimately, investors will reach a state where they no longer need external adjustments, and the trading process itself will become natural and free of excessive intervention.
The process of forex trading is not only an exploration of the market, but also a self-cultivation. Through continuous self-improvement and practice, investors can gradually overcome their inner greed and fear, maintaining composure and rationality in the market. This process of self-cultivation requires investors to possess a firm will and the ability to continuously learn. Through constant reflection and reflection, investors can gradually improve their trading skills and mental fortitude.
In forex trading, investors should mitigate greed and fear during trading through technical means and mindset adjustments. However, these methods are only short-term mitigations, not fundamental solutions. Investors should fundamentally overcome these negative emotions by continuously improving their cognitive abilities and trading skills. Ultimately, through continuous self-cultivation, investors will be able to maintain composure and rationality in the market and achieve stable trading performance.

In forex trading, there is a significant market pattern: when professional forex traders demonstrate full confidence and enter the market, it is often the moment when general market confidence collapses and panic selling occurs. Conversely, when general market confidence surges and investors enter the market enthusiastically, it is also the moment when professional forex traders decisively exit the market and lock in profits.
From the perspective of trading behavior, the so-called "full confidence" or "collapse of confidence" expressed by the general public is essentially a "follow-the-herd" behavior lacking independent judgment, manifesting itself in blindly following market trends, chasing ups and downs. This type of trading behavior is highly likely to lead to losses. The core reason is that the public's confidence is not based on a deep understanding of market principles and professional analysis. They do not systematically analyze macroeconomic indicators, exchange rate fluctuations, or the intrinsic value of the trading targets to seize reasonable trading opportunities. More often, it stems from subjective assumptions based on "self-perception superior to others." This confidence, lacking professional support, is essentially irrational self-overestimation and often leads to losses.
In stark contrast, professional traders' confidence is based on rigorous professional analysis and independent judgment, and their trading decisions often go against market expectations. When most market participants are pessimistic and generally bearish on a particular trading direction, professional traders, through in-depth analysis and analysis, identify potential opportunities and bolster their confidence to enter the market. However, when market sentiment turns to fervor and the general public confidently rushes into the market, professional traders will withdraw promptly to avoid potential risks based on a rational assessment of market valuations and risk-return ratios. This behavioral characteristic of "counter-market sentiment decision-making" is the core difference between professional traders and the general public in their trading cognition and operational logic, and is also the key to professional traders achieving long-term, stable returns.

In the context of forex investment and trading, whether a trader is suitable for using leveraged tools is not a single, absolute answer. The core criteria for judgment always revolve around the matching of the trading cycle with specific market conditions. The market characteristics under different cycles and the risk profile of different market environments directly determine the suitability of leverage tools and the appropriate degree of their use.
The industry generally agrees that many investment experts clearly oppose the reckless use of leverage by retail investors in forex trading. This viewpoint is essentially about risk protection for retail investors, not about denying the viability of leveraged tools in forex trading. Forex trading is inherently highly volatile, and leverage is like a "trading fast track": if unleveraged trading is like driving on a regular road, then leveraged trading is like being on a high-speed track at 250-300 kilometers per hour. For retail investors who lack professional analytical skills and risk management experience, trading on this "high-leverage fast track" can easily lead to losses, even the risk of a complete liquidation, due to their limited ability to cope with market fluctuations and low risk tolerance. Therefore, from a risk management perspective, retail investors are advised to prioritize unleveraged or low-leverage trading, maintaining a steady and slow trading pace. Even if the profit cycle is longer, they can gradually approach their trading goals while ensuring the safety of their funds, achieving a balance between risk and return.
The core risk of leveraged instruments lies not simply in their amplified yields, but rather in their accelerated amplification of losses, known as the "accelerated loss" feature. Once a trade deviates from market trends, leverage will simultaneously amplify account losses, leading traders to experience significant short-term capital losses and even a rapid exit from the market. Furthermore, the key prerequisite for using leverage is the matching of leverage and asset volatility. A mismatch between the two can directly lead to systemic risk. For example, if a trader chooses 10x leverage when the annualized volatility of the underlying asset is as high as 50%, even if there are no extreme market conditions in the short term, the severe imbalance between volatility and leverage will lead to a high probability of liquidation in the long term. Conversely, if the underlying asset's annualized volatility is low and the trader can accurately assess the volatility range, then moderate use of leverage is more reasonable.
It is important to note that the leverage offered by different forex brokers varies, further complicating the matching of leverage and asset volatility. From a professional trading perspective, the core principle of leveraging is a 1:1 relationship between annualized volatility and leverage. This means that the leverage ratio used by traders should not exceed the annualized volatility of the underlying asset, and the ratio should at least be close to 1:1. If the leverage ratio significantly exceeds the annualized volatility (e.g., using 5x leverage when volatility is 30%), the account's risk exposure will be excessively increased. Even short-term profits will be difficult to mitigate against the risk of drawdowns caused by market fluctuations. Only when leverage and volatility are properly matched can leverage be used to increase profit potential while effectively limiting losses, achieving the rational use of leverage tools.

In the field of forex investment and trading, the "chain of contempt" that exists among traders is essentially a manifestation of immature trading knowledge.
Only by facing the irrational nature of this phenomenon, abandoning a confrontational mindset, and returning to an open and peaceful trading perspective can we lay the mental foundation for long-term trading success.
In the actual foreign exchange market, the phenomenon of a "chain of contempt" is quite common, manifesting in two main typical forms. First, there is the mutual exclusion between trading analysis schools: traders who focus on fundamental analysis often view the logical framework of technical analysis schools negatively; conversely, traders who follow the technical analysis school often question the validity of fundamental analysis, forming a "school of contempt chain." Second, there is the hierarchical conflict among traders based on experience or short-term performance: experienced traders in the market tend to look down on the operational thinking and risk management abilities of novice traders. Some traders who have achieved significant short-term returns may also develop a sense of superiority over participants using other trading models, thereby fostering a "chain of contempt for experience and performance."
This type of contempt chain reflects the cognitive immaturity of traders. Top traders with deep trading skills and extensive practical experience often possess a calm and tolerant mindset. They deeply understand that the complexity and diversity of the forex market dictate that there is no single correct trading logic. Different analytical schools and trading models each have their core strengths and applicable scenarios, and each must be tailored to the trader's individual perspective, risk appetite, and capabilities. For example, fundamental analysis excels in identifying long-term exchange rate trends, while technical analysis offers greater flexibility in identifying short-term market trends and selecting entry points. Neither approach is inherently superior; the key lies in whether it aligns with the trader's personal characteristics and trading goals.
Once traders fall into the cognitive trap of a contempt chain, two core risks are highly likely to arise. First, it fosters a self-aggrandizing cognitive bias, trapping traders in a self-reinforcing mindset. Firmly believing in the superiority of their own school or trading model leads them to exaggerate its strengths and overlook its limitations, ultimately reducing their sensitivity to market fluctuations. When market logic undergoes structural shifts and the adaptability of existing trading systems weakens, stagnant cognition makes it difficult to quickly adjust strategies, potentially leading to unexpected losses. Furthermore, a culture of contempt hinders traders' cognitive advancement—not only does it exclude alternative trading ideas and models, but it also blocks the path to improving their own trading systems by drawing on diverse experience. This, in the long run, limits the expansion and improvement of trading capabilities.
For forex traders, the rational approach is to establish an open and inclusive cognitive framework: They must clearly recognize the boundaries and limitations of their current trading capabilities and avoid blindly exaggerating the superiority of their own models. They must also respect and understand the legitimacy of alternative trading logics and acknowledge the effectiveness of different trading models in specific market environments. Even if alternative trading models don't align with their risk appetite and skill set, they should objectively view their value rather than falling into a state of denial and disdain. This mindset of "facing oneself and embracing others" is key for traders to avoid cognitive rigidity and continuously adapt to market changes. It also provides a crucial psychological foundation for achieving long-term, stable trading.

In the field of foreign exchange investment and trading, "submit to the market and follow the market" is the core principle that governs every transaction and the underlying logic for traders to achieve long-term stable operations.
As the world's largest financial market, the foreign exchange market is influenced by a complex interplay of factors, including macroeconomic policies, geopolitical dynamics, and international trade data. It is characterized by both objectivity and uncertainty. A trader's core goal is not to attempt to control or fight the market, but rather to accurately understand market trends, proactively adapt to market dynamics, and achieve reasonable returns by following the market. Any attempt to defy market trends through subjective will ultimately faces extremely high risks and may even result in significant losses in the trading account.
From the perspective of the fundamental characteristics of the foreign exchange market, its most notable feature is its "anti-individual dominance": the market does not rely on individual wisdom or capital scale to move, but rather has a strong ability to correct traders' excessive egos. Many traders fall into two common misconceptions when they first enter the market: the belief that "small cleverness can beat the market," and the conviction that "capital advantage can dominate market trends." In reality, the foreign exchange market is full of intelligent and knowledgeable participants. If traders blindly pursue "outsmarting the market" and attempt to profit through short-term speculation or exploiting market loopholes, they will ultimately ignore the market's overall integrity and objectivity, leading to frequent decision-making errors. Furthermore, if traders with larger capital bases blindly equate capital advantage with market dominance and attempt to influence exchange rate trends through large trades, they will become the "common target" of other market participants. When the market perceives a trader's large position or operational intentions, other participants will synergize and counteract the trader's strategy, ultimately rendering the trader's strategy ineffective and even exposing him to the risk of losing his account.
A deeper analysis of market logic reveals that profiting in the foreign exchange market essentially comes from "profiting from overall market fluctuations," not "outperforming other traders." If traders position themselves as "opponents of the market" and try to gain an advantage by playing against other participants, especially when traders with larger capital over-expose their operating intentions and are identified by the market as "big players", their position direction and trading strategy will become an important reference for other participants, thus triggering targeted reverse operations. At this point, the capital scale of "big players" is no longer an advantage, but instead becomes a disadvantage of "being attacked by a concentrated attack" - the market will gradually devour their account funds through the imbalance of long and short forces, and eventually this corrects "aggressive trading." This also explains why, in the forex market, traders who "play high and low" often struggle to achieve sustained profits, while those who "keep a low profile and follow the market" are more likely to achieve long-term, stable returns.
For forex traders, understanding and practicing the concept of "holding back" is crucial. "Holding back" here doesn't mean passively retreating or abandoning trading opportunities, but rather a trading mindset and operating principle of "restraining oneself and respecting the market." On the one hand, "holding back" means reining in overinflated subjective desires, abandoning the illusion of "controlling the market," and viewing market fluctuations objectively and rationally, avoiding blindly predicting market trends or forcibly reversing them. On the other hand, "holding back" means prudently managing the trading rhythm, avoiding the pursuit of "extreme returns" and avoiding high-volatility markets that exceed one's risk tolerance. One should appropriately position oneself when market trends are clear and withdraw promptly when trends become unclear. Through a strategy of "doing what you should and not doing what you shouldn't," one can achieve a balance between risk and reward.
From a practical perspective, the core of "surrendering to the market and following the market" lies in "following the trend." Specifically, traders need to use fundamental analysis to grasp long-term exchange rate trends and technical analysis to identify short-term entry and exit opportunities. Once a market trend emerges, they should strictly formulate trading strategies in line with the trend to avoid being derailed by short-term market fluctuations. Furthermore, they need to establish a comprehensive risk management system. By setting appropriate stop-loss and take-profit points and controlling the proportion of positions held in a single commodity, they can mitigate potential market fluctuations. This ensures that strategies can be adjusted promptly when trends shift, minimizing losses.
In short, the process of forex trading is essentially a cognitive upgrade from "confrontation" to "adaptation" between traders and the market. Only by abandoning the confrontational mentality of "outsmarting and outspending" and gaining a deep understanding of the market's objectivity and dominance, respecting the market with a "submissive" attitude, adapting to the market with a "following" strategy, and managing risk with the principle of "convergence" can one gain a firm foothold in the complex and volatile forex market and achieve long-term, sustainable trading returns.



13711580480@139.com
+86 137 1158 0480
+86 137 1158 0480
+86 137 1158 0480
z.x.n@139.com
Mr. Z-X-N
China · Guangzhou