---

Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management

---

In forex trading, simply focusing on entry and exit points is insufficient; position management is the core element of successful trading.

---

Traders must comprehensively consider the three key factors of entry and exit points, as well as position size. The ultimate success or failure of a trade isn't determined solely by entry and exit points; position management strategies also play a crucial role. For example, employing different position management strategies, such as small-scale, staged expansion, pyramid expansion, or inverted pyramid expansion, can significantly impact trading results.
Knowing when to exit isn't a simple guessing game; it's fundamentally a part of money management. If a trader holds a large position early in a market and the market subsequently moves in their favor, it's wise to consider taking profits and reducing the position to prepare for a potential sharp correction. This not only locks in some profits but also reduces the risk of significant losses from a market reversal.
In addition, when a trader's base or top positions are relatively light and market performance is positive, it's reasonable to increase their position size appropriately. However, when increasing their positions, traders must consider the balance of long-term position accumulation and ensure reasonable position management and allocation. This not only helps optimize capital efficiency but also maintains flexibility during market fluctuations, allowing for better response to various market conditions.

In the field of forex investment and trading, assessing a trader's suitability for trading requires comprehensive consideration of their emotional self-control, learning ability, and self-reflection, with self-reflection being particularly critical.

---

These abilities not only determine whether a trader can maintain rationality during market fluctuations but also directly impact their long-term trading performance.
On the one hand, some traders demonstrate a strong competitive spirit and excellent risk management skills. They fully understand that the core of forex investment lies in balancing risk and opportunity. Therefore, they maintain a high level of risk awareness throughout the trading process and are willing to take risks within a manageable range. This type of trader typically responds rationally to market fluctuations and avoids being emotionally swayed by short-term gains and losses, thus maintaining a stable trading strategy in the complex and volatile forex market. Through precise risk assessment and prudent position management, they ensure they pursue profits while effectively limiting potential losses.
On the other hand, some traders demonstrate a high degree of humility and a strong thirst for knowledge. They not only humbly accept advice and experience from others but also draw lessons from their own trading experiences to continuously refine their strategies. These traders often possess strong learning abilities, adapting quickly to market changes and adjusting their mindset when faced with failure, avoiding emotionally driven mistakes. Through continuous learning and self-improvement, they gradually refine their trading systems and improve their trading efficiency.
In forex trading, emotional self-control, learning capacity, and self-reflection are key factors for a trader's success. Traders with these abilities can remain calm and rational in both good and bad market conditions, thus achieving stable returns over the long term. These skills not only help traders survive in the market but also enable them to stand out from the competition and achieve sustainable trading success.

In forex trading, even if a trader correctly predicts market direction, they may be unable to hold their position. This is often because their position is too large and they cannot withstand floating losses. Proper position management is key to ensuring traders remain calm during market fluctuations.

---

For long-term forex traders, retracement entries offer advantages over trend extension entries. Retracement entries often avoid experiencing floating losses, while trend extension entries may require some floating losses. Traders should be mentally prepared; by preparing ahead of time, they will avoid panicking during market fluctuations.
From the perspective of professional investors, retracements and corrections in the forex market are, to some extent, positive signals, as they provide better entry points for long-term investments and reduce the chance of missing out. However, amateur investors often have a completely different perspective. They often overreact to market fluctuations: euphoric when a trend extends significantly, and anxious and uneasy when a trend retraces sharply.
Professional forex traders favor market pullbacks and corrections because these adjustments provide them with more favorable entry points. Only during significant market corrections can traders establish long-term positions at more favorable prices, thereby potentially reaping greater returns from subsequent trend developments. This rational approach to market fluctuations and effective utilization of them is a key difference between professional and amateur traders.

In the risk perception system of forex trading, there is a fundamental difference between "floating losses in the wrong direction" and "floating losses in the right direction." This difference directly determines a trader's response strategy and account safety margins, and is also the core indicator that distinguishes professional traders from ordinary traders in terms of risk judgment.

---

From a risk perspective, floating losses in the wrong direction are characterized by irreversibility and amplification. When a trader's position deviates from the core market trend, floating losses are essentially "inevitable losses due to trend inertia"—as the trend continues, the magnitude of the loss will expand linearly or even nonlinearly over time. At this point, floating losses have become "real losses," and the probability of recovering them in the short term through a spontaneous market correction is extremely low. In this scenario, the core principle for professional traders is to avoid adding to positions against the trend: adding positions against the trend further increases risk exposure, accelerating losses and easily triggering the risk of a margin call. A "carrying a position" strategy is only feasible under two specific conditions: first, the initial position is strictly controlled at an extremely low level; second, the account has sufficient idle funds to cover the maximum potential floating loss, and the underlying asset is a low-volatility, high-consolidation currency pair. In this case, the underlying logic of "carrying a position" is not blind speculation, but rather based on the "mean reversion principle"—the price fluctuations of low-risk currency pairs tend to fluctuate around the mean over the long term. As long as the risk exposure is avoided, a turnaround is theoretically possible, but this comes at a high cost in time and capital.
In contrast, floating losses in the right direction are considered "temporary fluctuations within a continuing trend" and possess "reversibility" and "benign characteristics." These floating losses often occur after a trend has formed, when the market experiences a pullback due to factors such as short-term profit-taking and corrections in technical indicators. Essentially, they are part of a healthy trend. For professional traders, "holding positions" during these times is the right choice in line with long-term trading logic—by enduring short-term floating losses, they avoid missing out on the main uptrend due to premature closing. Large investors, in particular, view these benign pullbacks as "windows of opportunity to increase positions." When floating losses turn into floating profits and they confirm that the pullback has not disrupted the trend structure, they gradually expand their positions by buying on dips (in a bullish trend) or selling on rallies (in a bearish trend), accumulating a foundation for long-term profits. The core logic behind this strategy is that benign pullbacks do not change the trend direction; instead, they reduce the holding costs of subsequent positions and improve the overall risk-reward ratio of the position.
Fundamentally, floating losses in the wrong direction are "trend losses" lacking market logic. Failure to control risk promptly could lead to systemic account risk. On the other hand, floating losses in the right direction are "periodic fluctuations," a normal part of a trend. Through scientific position management and patient holding, they can ultimately translate into substantial profits. Therefore, traders need to establish a decision-making process that "first determines the trend direction, then defines the nature of the loss." This not only tests their ability to manage emotions, but also demonstrates their market learning and trading reflection skills in practice.

In the risk classification framework for foreign exchange trading, "consecutive losses" and "floating losses" are both forms of risk, but they differ fundamentally in their outcome attributes, associated trading cycles, and formation logic. Clarifying these differences is a key prerequisite for traders to optimize their risk management systems and tailor their trading strategies.

---

Based on its definition and outcome attributes, a losing streak is a "closed-loop, deterministic loss." Its core characteristic is that "trading has terminated and the loss has been locked in." Essentially, it represents the established fact that after a trader closes multiple positions, their account equity continues to decrease. There's no possibility that subsequent price fluctuations will reverse the loss. Each loss represents a complete trading cycle (opening a position, holding a position, and closing it). The magnitude of the loss is determined by the price difference at the time of closing, and is considered an "irreversible, actual loss." In terms of correlation with trading cycles, losing streaks are more likely to occur in short-term trading scenarios. Short-term trading (such as day trading and scalping) relies on frequent opening and closing of positions to generate small profits. This high frequency of operation can amplify the impact of "judgment errors." If short-term traders misjudge the rhythm of market fluctuations and price points, or fail to implement stop-loss strategies effectively, they can easily accumulate multiple losses in a short period of time, leading to a losing streak. Furthermore, short-term trading is more sensitive to market noise. In volatile markets lacking a clear trend, frequent entry and exit can easily trigger "false signal traps," further increasing the probability of losing streaks.
In contrast, floating losses are "temporary fluctuations without a closed loop." Their core characteristic is that trading activity continues, and losses are not locked in. They are also highly tied to the long-term trading cycle. The core principle of long-term trading (such as daily and weekly trend trading) is to capture large-scale trend profits. Therefore, it is necessary to withstand periodic drawdowns within the trend. Floating losses are the manifestation of these drawdowns in the account, and their magnitude changes in real time with price fluctuations. If the price subsequently returns to the opening price, the floating loss can be converted into floating profit or even actual profit, thus being "reversible." From a trader's perspective, short-term traders, due to their frequent position closing habits, typically set strict fixed stop-loss conditions (such as point stop-loss or percentage stop-loss). When the price hits the stop-loss level, the trade is automatically closed, locking in losses as actual losses. Therefore, "continuous floating losses" rarely occur. Long-term traders, on the other hand, often set more relaxed stop-loss conditions (such as trend structure stop-loss or moving average stop-loss) to avoid being "washed out" of the trend by short-term fluctuations. They may even avoid setting hard stop-loss conditions until they are certain that the trend has not reversed. This allows floating losses to persist longer and fluctuate more freely.
Based on the logical relationship between the two, consecutive losses and floating losses can exist independently or indirectly. On the one hand, traders focused on long-term trading, if they can accurately judge the trend direction, can recover losses even when facing floating losses by holding positions and waiting for the trend to continue, typically avoiding consecutive losses. However, if long-term traders misjudge the trend direction and fail to promptly control risks, they may be forced to close their positions after their floating losses continue to expand. A single large loss can have a severe impact on the account's net worth and even indirectly affect their subsequent trading mentality, increasing the risk of consecutive losses in subsequent operations. On the other hand, consecutive losses for short-term traders often result from the accumulation of multiple small liquidation losses, which are not directly related to floating losses. However, frequent consecutive losses may cause a trader's mentality to become unbalanced, and when attempting to switch to long-term trading, their emotions may interfere with their judgment of the trend direction, leading to unexpected floating losses.
In summary, consecutive losses are the inevitable result of "high-frequency trading combined with accumulated errors" in short-term trading and should be avoided by optimizing short-term strategies, strictly enforcing stop-loss orders, and controlling trading frequency. Floating losses are temporary phenomena associated with "trend pullbacks combined with holding positions for gains" in long-term trading and should be managed by accurately assessing trend direction, setting stop-loss conditions scientifically, and developing a resilient mindset. Traders should clearly understand the differences between the two and their corresponding strategies based on their trading cycles and risk tolerance to avoid misaligning risk management strategies due to conceptual confusion.

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---