---

Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management

---

In today's highly developed internet age, forex traders have significant advantages over breakout entry strategies when choosing a market entry strategy.

---

The core of the breakout buying strategy is to capture a one-way trend. It assumes that the market will continue to rise, with no room for pullbacks. Investors using this strategy buy during a rally, hoping that prices will continue to rise, thereby maximizing profits. However, this strategy requires investors to accurately identify and consistently participate in one-way trends. Once a market pullback occurs, investors may face significant risks. For example, if investors buy at a market high and the market subsequently pulls back, they may suffer losses.
In contrast, a pullback entry strategy is more cautious. This strategy aims to wait for a structural market pullback before buying. Investors believe that even if the market reaches a new high, it will inevitably experience a pullback. By buying during a pullback, investors can enter the market at a lower price, thereby increasing the safety of their trades and their potential returns. This approach emphasizes finding a more reasonable entry point after a market correction, rather than blindly buying at market highs.
The choice between these two strategies reflects different investors' trading styles and risk preferences. Investors using the breakout buying approach prioritize the market's upside potential and are willing to buy at high levels in the hope that the market will continue to rise. They prioritize the market's upward trend over price fluctuations. Investors using the retracement entry approach prioritize safety, lowering their entry costs and minimizing potential risk by waiting for a market correction.
It's important to note that there's no absolute superiority or inferiority between these two strategies; rather, it depends on the investor's trading style and market environment. In a one-way upward trend, the breakout buying approach may be more effective; in a volatile market, the retracement entry approach may be more advantageous. Investors should choose a trading strategy that suits them based on their risk tolerance and market experience.
In short, in forex trading, both the retracement entry and the breakout entry approaches have their own applicable scenarios and advantages. Investors should flexibly choose their entry strategy based on market conditions and their personal trading style to achieve optimal trading results.

In the field of forex investment and trading, traders of different skill levels exhibit significant differences in their position management and risk management strategies. Ordinary retail forex traders typically increase their positions when they are experiencing losses, hoping to dilute their losses by increasing their exposure; professional and advanced traders, on the other hand, increase their positions when they are profitable, hoping to maximize their returns.

---

Specifically, retail forex traders may still increase their positions even if they misjudge the market direction, resulting in floating losses. Conversely, professional and advanced traders only consider increasing their positions when they accurately judge the market direction and their positions, despite experiencing short-term floating losses, are in line with their expectations.
Ordinary retail forex traders often lack systematic professional training, and their trading decisions are easily influenced by subjective emotions and empiricism, often exhibiting a tendency to increase their positions as prices fall. Professional traders, on the other hand, tend to "increase their positions as prices rise." Their core logic is this: for profitable positions that meet expectations, they increase their positions to further maximize gains; for positions that go against expectations and are in an unfavorable situation, they promptly reduce their holdings or even close them outright to control risk.
It should be noted that these strategic differences are not due to subjective biases in the financial market. The foreign exchange market, as an objective trading venue, presents the same market environment to all participants. There is no "favoritism" or "targeting" of certain traders. The true driver of different trading outcomes lies in the traders' own strategic choices. For example, faced with the same misjudgment, some retail investors may lose $100,000, while others may lose $2 million. This disparity stems from different position management strategies and risk management approaches.
Retail forex traders are prone to "loss aversion" and the "ostrich mentality" when trading. When a position incurs losses, they are unwilling to admit their misjudgment and attempt to recoup their losses by buying more as the price drops, hoping for a rebound. This essentially becomes irrational gambling, highly dependent on luck. If the market continues to deviate from expectations, they face significant losses.
The core advantage of professional traders lies in their ability to transcend emotional interference and strictly adhere to the key strategy of "cutting losses": when losses on a position reach the pre-set stop-loss level, they decisively close the position to limit further losses. At the same time, for positions that are performing as expected and showing continued profit growth, they boldly increase their positions to consolidate gains. This "firm stop-loss and profit-maximizing" approach, not relying on luck, is based on a systematic risk control system and profit-maximizing logic, and is the core hallmark of a professional trader.

In the world of forex trading, whether the loneliness and solitude experienced by traders is a subjective state of enjoyment or an objective result of helplessness ultimately depends on the trader's unique personality traits and cognitive dimensions.

---

From the perspective of the correlation between trading ability and behavioral characteristics, the higher the forex trader's skill level, the greater their reliance on their own market-proven and effective response systems. Such traders tend to exhibit greater independence and, accordingly, are more likely to experience relative loneliness. However, this loneliness is not a passive predicament, but rather a chosen enjoyment. This is not a deliberate attempt to stay in a closed-loop cognitive state, but rather the highly specialized nature of their trading cognition and logic, making it difficult for those who truly understand their perspectives to do so. Furthermore, they lack the willingness to explain themselves to those whose cognitions do not match theirs. After all, in a professional field, those with similar cognitions can reach consensus instantly, while those with misaligned cognitions struggle to achieve effective understanding even after prolonged communication.
Furthermore, from the perspective of time investment and accumulated experience, high-level traders focus considerable energy on market research and trading practice. Their depth of knowledge and market insight have formed a unique "capacity barrier." This barrier leads them to actively avoid superficial discussions about trading and investment in their daily lives. The core reason lies in differences in trading knowledge. High-level, practical traders are generally not keen on discussing trading with those whose knowledge level is not aligned with theirs. The exceptions are forex educators, who, out of professional obligation to impart professional knowledge and address misconceptions, will actively engage in conversation.
For most high-level traders, trading decisions themselves require considerable mental effort, so they crave quiet time to unwind: either by poring over professional textbooks to refine their knowledge or calmly analyzing market conditions to optimize their trading strategies. They often view the market's complex and redundant information noise, as well as the irrational emotional fluctuations of ordinary investors, with some even choosing to distance themselves from the hustle and bustle to establish independent research and decision-making space. In stark contrast, those who are keen on participating in lively market discussions and chasing short-term market trends are mostly beginners in the initial stages of trading.
It's important to understand that forex investment and trading isn't about following trends. Instead, traders must focus on their strengths in a relatively independent environment, cultivating a personalized, systematic trading system. This pursuit of "focus and independence" has become a common trait among mature traders.

In the field of forex investment and trading, truly enlightened investors often follow the 80/20 rule of trading.

---

They deeply understand that to join the 20% of successful investors, they must master superior methods and strategies. This understanding stems not only from deep market insight but also from the continuous improvement of their own abilities.
In the process of educating forex traders, forex educators often face numerous challenges. The essence of education isn't simply about "teaching" but about guiding students to find what they truly need. This type of guidance is more like a precise matching process, similar to the saying "matching the right person for the right situation." We firmly believe that the purpose of education is to awaken those who desire awakening. If students lack this inherent motivation, even repeated emphasis from educators will be difficult to achieve. In fact, many investors are already on the brink of enlightenment, lacking that final push. Forex investment mentors aim to help them take this crucial step through education. However, due to the passage of time and the complexity of the market, the dropout rate remains high. This phenomenon is common across all sectors.
This does not mean that investors who leave a forex investment mentor are destined to fail, but rather that they may need to experience more setbacks and failures before truly realizing the value of education. Forex investment mentors often encounter investors who only seek help after experiencing multiple failures and significant losses. However, before entering the learning phase, they often do not embrace the mentor's educational services.
Therefore, forex investment educators emphasize that guidance is most effective when investors truly recognize their needs and are ready to embrace education. As the saying goes, "You can only save those who seek help." If someone remains lost and doesn't acknowledge their own problems, then they lack alignment with the forex investment educator's educational philosophy. Forex investment educators are not omnipotent; success requires the active cooperation of students.
In short, in forex trading, the role of forex investment educators is to guide and inspire, not to indoctrinate. Investors must possess inherent motivation and preparation to truly benefit from education. Only when investors reach that critical "middle level" can the forex investment educator's education truly realize its value.

In forex trading, a trader's stop-loss decision is not directly related to the size of their position. The core judgment is the alignment between current market trends and the pre-set trading plan. In other words, stop-loss operations should be based on whether the trading plan is still feasible to execute, rather than on position size as the decision-making criterion.

---

Specifically, in actual trading scenarios, large positions shouldn't preclude you from executing a stop-loss when the market triggers your pre-set stop-loss point. Similarly, small positions shouldn't preclude you from strictly enforcing stop-loss rules. The essence of a stop-loss decision lies in a rational assessment of whether market conditions deviate from your trading plan expectations. If market trends deviate from your established trading plan (e.g., a three-month plan for a specific trading cycle), and this deviation reaches the risk tolerance threshold, stop-loss execution must be implemented as planned, regardless of the current position size.
From the inherent logic of trading plans and position management, stop-loss strategies for different positions are already incorporated into the position management system from the very beginning of the trading plan. When constructing a trading plan, traders must clearly define the current position's role within the overall trading framework—whether it serves as a core underlying position or a supplementary position used to capture short-term opportunities. Furthermore, stop-loss rules should be pre-set based on the position's positioning, including the stop-loss point, stop-loss margin, and post-stop-loss response plan. This means that stop-loss orders aren't ad hoc decisions, but rather pre-emptive arrangements that organically integrate position management with the trading plan. Their rationale is fully validated during the planning phase.
Furthermore, the construction of a trading plan requires flexibility and targeted approach, rather than a single, fixed, "one-size-fits-all" approach. In practice, traders may simultaneously establish positions with varying positioning for the same underlying asset (e.g., a base or top position versus a swing position), and the corresponding entry points, stop-loss rules, and profit targets for these positions may differ. Such differentiated plan design must be tailored to the trader's risk tolerance, preferred trading cycle, and market conditions. Therefore, trading plans can vary significantly from trader to trader, making it difficult to establish a unified standard.
It's worth noting that some traders fall into a psychological trap when executing stop-loss orders: when their positions are heavy and the market triggers their stop-loss points, they often abandon their stop-loss orders out of reluctance to accept a significant loss. This mindset essentially reflects an oversight during the planning phase of the trade. If risk tolerance for larger positions is not fully assessed at the outset, and if risk hedging or position adjustment plans after a stop-loss are not clearly defined, psychological resistance may arise when the stop-loss is actually triggered. Therefore, when formulating a trading plan, traders must anticipate psychological expectations for different position sizes and factor "psychological acceptance" into their plans. This ensures that stop-loss rules are not only logically sound but also strictly enforced in practice, preventing psychological factors from causing trading plans to fail.

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---