Trade for your account.
MAM | PAMM | POA.
Forex prop firm | Asset management company | Personal large funds.
Formal starting from $500,000, test starting from $50,000.
Profits are shared by half (50%), and losses are shared by a quarter (25%).
*No teaching *No selling courses *No discussion *If yes, no reply!
Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management
In two-way forex trading, traders need to be able to selectively enter and set stop-loss orders.
This ability relies not only on a deep understanding of the market but also on precise risk management. Selective entry means traders don't blindly follow market fluctuations, but instead choose the most profitable opportunities based on their trading strategy and risk appetite. Stop-loss orders are a risk management tool, but they don't always need to be used.
Forex traders can assess the strength of a currency pair's momentum by observing its retracements. If a currency pair experiences significant retracements, it typically indicates weak market momentum. In this case, traders may choose not to enter a new position or accumulate it. This selective entry strategy helps avoid trading in unfavorable market conditions, thereby reducing potential losses. It's important to note that not all market conditions are worth participating in; traders should use their own analysis and judgment to select the trading opportunities that best suit them.
In forex trading, traders don't always need to set stop-loss orders. After confirming the overall market trend, being able to withstand a certain level of floating losses is a valuable skill. This ability is one of the key factors for successful trading. However, many traders, while able to withstand floating losses, struggle to withstand floating gains. This psychological phenomenon leads many retail investors to frequent losses in the market. While there are many strategy sharers and market evangelists in the forex market, few address this crucial psychological factor.
For retail forex traders with small capital, a change in mindset is crucial. By operating with a small position, traders can effectively address a range of trading challenges, such as reversing positions, overweight positions, high-frequency trading, averaging, and the use of no stop-loss orders. Operating with a small position not only reduces the risk of a single trade but also allows traders greater flexibility in the face of market fluctuations. For example, operating with a small position can mitigate significant losses caused by adverse market fluctuations while also providing traders with more opportunities to adjust their positions or wait for better trading opportunities.
In short, in two-way forex trading, traders need to be able to selectively enter and stop losses, determine entry timing by observing market retracements, and learn to tolerate a certain amount of floating losses after confirming the general trend. For small retail investors, operating with a small position is an effective strategy that can help them avoid common trading pitfalls and achieve stable trading in the complex forex market.
In the two-way forex market, "profit and loss come from the same source" is the underlying logic that runs through all trading behaviors and is a core principle that every investor must understand.
The essence of this principle lies in the symbiotic relationship between the volatility of the forex market and its trading mechanisms. Whether going long or short, traders' logic for profit and risk of loss stem from the same market variables, such as the exchange rate's response to macroeconomic data, market sentiment fluctuations caused by geopolitical events, and the simultaneous amplification effect of leverage on both returns and risks. For example, if a trader goes long on a currency based on the expectation of a central bank rate hike, but the market experiences a reverse swing after the rate hike, buying the expectation and selling the reality, the trading logic that might have led to profit can actually lead to losses. Conversely, if the trader accurately predicts the market's reversal and chooses to go short, the risk factor can be transformed into a source of profit. This shows that there is no absolute "profit path" or "risk path" in forex trading. Profit and risk are always inseparable, and the conversion between the two depends solely on the trader's accurate judgment of market variables and their response strategies.
At the same time, there are no "quick fixes" in forex trading; a trader's maturity inevitably relies on deep, intensive practice over time. This practice isn't simply a matter of accumulated trading time, but rather the continuous iteration of multiple dimensions, encompassing market understanding, trading systems, and mindset management. From a market perspective, novice traders often need to navigate multiple complete market cycles (such as economic expansion and contraction cycles and interest rate adjustments) to truly understand the underlying logic of exchange rate fluctuations under different macroeconomic conditions, rather than simply relying on superficial interpretations of short-term technical indicators. From a trading system perspective, a stable and effective trading strategy requires countless market validations, parameter optimization, and risk testing to maintain adaptability in diverse market environments. This process cannot be achieved through short-term learning or imitation. From a mindset perspective, traders need to gradually overcome irrational emotions such as greed and fear through repeated cycles of profit and loss, building a reverence for trading rules and confidence in their own strategies. The maturity of this mindset also requires time and practice.
Furthermore, seemingly "simple" operations in forex trading actually embody a complex system of knowledge and accumulated experience. Many novice traders often fall into the "operational simplification" trap, assuming that basic operations like opening and closing positions are straightforward and easy to understand, while overlooking the underlying decision-making logic behind each position. In reality, a sound position building strategy requires comprehensive consideration of multiple factors: Macroeconomic analysis requires analyzing economic data from major global economies (such as GDP, inflation, and unemployment rates), monetary policy trends (such as central bank interest rate decisions and quantitative easing), and geopolitical risks (such as trade frictions and geopolitical conflicts). Technical analysis requires interpreting candlestick patterns and trend indicators like the EMA (Express Moving Average) to determine the rationality of entry points and the risk-return balance. Fund management requires determining position size based on account size and risk tolerance, and setting stop-loss and take-profit levels to limit potential losses. This process is like the difference between "detonating an atomic bomb" and "manufacturing it"—the former involves a single operational step, while the latter requires a complex knowledge base encompassing multiple fields, including nuclear physics, materials science, and engineering, as well as long-term research and development. The same is true for position building in forex trading. Beneath its apparent simplicity lies the trader's integrated application of multidisciplinary knowledge and the accumulation of deep experience over many years.
Furthermore, the integration of knowledge and action in forex trading must be based on systematic, specialized, and intensive training. Without training, integration is simply empty talk. The so-called "unity of knowledge and action" means that traders' cognitive judgments are consistent with their actual trading behavior, neither deviating from their established strategies due to short-term market fluctuations nor abandoning risk control rules due to irrational emotions. The key to achieving this goal lies in establishing a closed loop of "cognition-trust-execution" through systematic training. From a cognitive perspective, traders need to master trading theory, market principles, and strategy logic through specialized learning. From a trust perspective, only by repeatedly validating the effectiveness of their strategies in various market scenarios through extensive backtesting of historical data, simulated trading exercises, and real-time trading with small amounts of capital can they establish deep trust in their strategies. This trust is not subjective, but rationally based on data and practice. From an execution perspective, systematic training can help traders develop "conditioned reflex" trading habits. When market signals align with their strategies, they can execute trades quickly and decisively, avoiding the consequences of hesitation, doubt, and other emotional distortions. Without systematic, dedicated, and intensive training, even if traders master the theoretical knowledge, they will struggle to build trust in their strategies due to a lack of practical verification. Ultimately, they will fall into the dilemma of "knowing but not implementing" in actual trading, failing to achieve true unity of knowledge and action.
In the world of forex trading, losses are often considered the harshest yet most effective mentors in a trader's growth.
While this perspective may seem harsh, it reveals a profound reality: in the complex environment of the forex market, there exists a vast gap between theoretical knowledge and practical experience, and losses are often the key factor in bridging this gap.
When successful forex traders share their experience and wisdom with newcomers, the newcomers often struggle to fully grasp the deeper meaning of these insights. This is because newcomers have not yet experienced the ups and downs and challenges of the market and lack the ability to apply these experiences to practical operations. Only after newcomers have experienced sufficient setbacks and paid the price of hardship in the market can they truly understand the value of these experiences. Losses are not only financially devastating but also psychologically challenging, forcing traders to re-evaluate their strategies and mindset.
The depth and frequency of losses, to a certain extent, determine the speed of a trader's growth. When losses reach a certain level, traders will begin to reflect on their behavior, identify the root causes, and gradually adjust their trading strategies. This self-reflection and adjustment is key to growth. However, if traders still fail to change their behavior after experiencing losses, it may mean they need to experience more setbacks until these lessons become profound enough to motivate them to make real changes.
In forex trading, losses are not the end, but rather a crucial turning point. They remind traders that the market is unpredictable and that success requires time and experience. Through continuous learning, reflection, and adjustment, traders can gradually improve their trading skills, reduce losses, and ultimately achieve profitability.
Therefore, for forex traders, losses should not be viewed as failures, but rather as learning opportunities. Every loss is a test for traders and a catalyst for their growth. Only through continuous learning and practice can traders find their own path in the turbulent forex market and ultimately reach the shores of success.
In the entire forex trading process, "holding short" is an often overlooked yet crucial step. Unlike opening and closing positions, which rely on technical analysis and market judgment, holding short isn't about a trader's technical skills (such as indicator interpretation, trend analysis, and position calculation), but rather about their mental resilience and stability in the face of market fluctuations.
The forex market operates 24/7, flooded with various market fluctuations and trading signals daily. Some signals may appear profitable, but in reality, they may conflict with a trader's core strategy or operate in a highly uncertain market environment (such as volatility before the release of important economic data or irrational fluctuations triggered by geopolitical events). During these times, a trader's ability to withstand the pressure of "missing out," maintain a short position, and avoid impulsive market entry that could distort their strategy directly reflects their psychological maturity—and this mental resilience is often the key difference between short-term profit earners and long-term, stable profit earners.
Based on professional trading logic, truly effective "waiting with a short position" isn't simply about not trading; it's about strategic waiting, based on the trader's own trading system. Its core principle is to "wait for trading opportunities that match their model before taking action." Specifically, experienced traders, through long-term practice and review, develop a clear trading model—one that includes clear entry conditions (such as specific candlestick patterns, indicator resonance signals, and volume breakthrough thresholds), exit rules (such as take-profit point calculations and stop-loss logic), risk control standards (such as single-ticket position limits and account drawdown tolerance), and adaptive market conditions (such as differentiated responses in trending and volatile markets). The process of waiting with a short position is essentially a dynamic screening of market conditions. When market conditions don't meet the model's entry conditions, traders proactively forgo non-essential opportunities and keep their funds idle. They only enter a position when market signals fully align with their model and the risk-reward ratio meets a pre-set standard (such as expected profit margins exceeding double the stop-loss margin). This kind of waiting isn't passive inaction, but rather strict adherence to a trading strategy. It's a necessary prerequisite for converting "probabilistic advantages" into "actual profits"—by filtering out low-quality trading signals and concentrating funds on capturing high-certainty opportunities, thereby improving overall trading win rates and profit-loss ratios.
In actual trading scenarios, some traders' "waiting with empty positions" often fall into the misconception of "passive observation." While the two may appear similar (neither involves entering the market), there are fundamental differences. Passive "waiting with empty positions" stems from the fact that traders haven't yet established their own market-proven trading models, strategies, or methods. Their empty positions aren't based on active strategy screening, but rather on the "psychological fear of losses." These traders often experience significant losses from repeated blind market entry, developing excessive anxiety about market risks and temporarily hesitating to take action, effectively becoming "forced to stop trading." From a behavioral perspective, passive observers often engage in a state of aimless waiting while holding a short position: unable to clearly identify market trends that meet their needs, and lacking clear entry criteria, their response to market signals exhibits a conflicting sense of both eagerness and fear. When they see a rising market, they lament their lack of entry, while when they see a decline, they celebrate their absence, constantly being swayed by market sentiment. This type of short-term waiting is essentially a helpless choice without strategic support. Once seemingly strong market signals emerge, or when other traders are spurred by profits, they are easily disrupted from this wait-and-see approach and fall back into a cycle of blindly entering the market, making it difficult to develop a stable trading strategy.
Further analysis of the core differences between the two reveals that actively waiting for a short position is a "strategy-driven, disciplined behavior." During this period, traders continuously track and review the market: on the one hand, they verify the alignment between the current market conditions and their own model; on the other hand, by reviewing past trading cases, they optimize the model details (such as adjusting the filter conditions for entry signals and refining the logic of stop-loss settings) to prepare for subsequent entries. Passive waiting, on the other hand, is an "emotion-driven, temporary compromise." During this period, traders lack systematic market analysis and are more likely to fluctuate between "fear" and "greed." They are unable to accumulate trading experience from this wait-and-see approach, nor do they develop a rational understanding of the market. Furthermore, the goal of actively waiting for a short position is to "capture high-certainty opportunities." The duration of the short position is determined by the alignment between the market conditions and the model, which can be several days hours, days, or even weeks, and strict adherence to the strategy after entering the market. The length of passive waiting is determined by emotional recovery. Once fear subsides or external stimuli arise, this waiting period may change arbitrarily. After entering the market, traders are also prone to frequent adjustments due to a lack of strategic support, leading to chaotic trading.
In two-way forex trading, swing trading inflection points—the historical tops and bottoms of the swing—are key nodes that traders need to pay special attention to.
When trading at these points, it is recommended to use lower leverage to control risk. Generally, leverage should not exceed 5x. While high leverage may bring higher returns, it also comes with higher risks, especially during periods of high market volatility, which can lead to significant losses. Therefore, a prudent trading strategy is to choose low leverage to ensure sufficient risk tolerance during market fluctuations.
Long-term forex investors typically focus on longer timeframes and tend to hold positions for extended periods of time in order to achieve long-term gains. However, as their observation period lengthens, they may find that suitable entry opportunities become increasingly rare. This is because long-term investors often wait for clear market trend signals, which are infrequent. Furthermore, long-term investors are typically large capital holders with ample funds and less pressure to live, thus reducing their reliance on trading. If they only invest long-term when clear market tops or bottoms appear, investment opportunities are indeed very limited. In this case, long-term investing may be viewed more as a recreational activity than a primary means of profit.
In contrast, short-term forex traders focus on shorter timeframes and tend to trade frequently to capture short-term market fluctuations. However, this high-frequency trading strategy also presents numerous problems. First, frequent trading can lead to numerous stop-loss orders, as short-term market fluctuations are difficult to accurately predict. Second, frequent trading consumes a significant amount of time and energy, especially when faced with market uncertainty and requires constant decision-making. Furthermore, short-term traders often face significant financial pressures and seek quick profits through trading to make ends meet. However, this impulsiveness often leads them to become overly impulsive in their trading, ultimately failing to achieve profitability and potentially depleting their principal, forcing them to exit the forex market.
Against this backdrop, swing trading becomes a more reasonable option. Swing trading combines the stability of long-term investing with the flexibility of short-term trading, making it suitable for highly volatile currencies like forex. Swing traders analyze medium-term market trends and identify appropriate entry and exit points, thereby profiting from market fluctuations. Long-term investors can leverage their long-term carry positions while also engaging in swing trading when attractive swing opportunities present themselves to maximize returns. This strategy not only capitalizes on medium-term market fluctuations but also mitigates risk to a certain extent, avoiding overreliance on a single long-term or short-term trading strategy.
In short, swing trading is a worthy priority in forex trading. It offers neither the scarcity of opportunities associated with long-term investing nor the excessive risk of short-term trading. By properly controlling leverage and combining the stability of long-term investing with the flexibility of short-term trading, swing trading can provide traders with a more balanced and sustainable investment approach.
13711580480@139.com
+86 137 1158 0480
+86 137 1158 0480
+86 137 1158 0480
z.x.n@139.com
Mr. Z-X-N
China · Guangzhou